TES Invented by Linda Din
Written by Peter Li-Chang Kuo
(Chinese)
Linda
Din, inventor of the "TES" system,
served as a speaker at APEC in 1998 and 2003. Drawing on her TES proposals, she
facilitated the drafting of the "E-Commerce
Constitution" and championed total economic solution — including
contactless payments, cashless transactions, IPR and ICT integration — that
helped humanity navigate financial crises and viral catastrophes.
Human
beings, limited by time and space, have managed to survive and reproduce in
harsh environments, becoming the most intelligent of all beings, because prioritizing
"mutual assistance." However,
sometimes helping others is met with returns like Mattel taking the production
tools I gifted them and relocating to
I, whom Ruth Handler, the inventor of Barbie, called a "Master," at a moment when I saw no solution, Linda Din—whom many called “Shimu” (the Master’s wife) — proposed that Taiwan need not remain constrained by time (t) and space (s). If a “new economy model” (e) were inserted between them, then "t-e-s" (TES) could transcend the limits of geography, travel across great distances, and overcome the constraints of an island economy — “riding the clouds beyond the four seas.”
The
two most fundamental elements in the real world are “time”
(t) and “space” (s), while human society
inevitably involves exchange — “economy” (e).
Seeking a solution to unemployment, Linda Din devoted herself to spiritual
discipline and, through what she regarded as divine inspiration, linked time
and space through a new economic model. Thus the term "TES," which would later
seek to reshape human history, was born.
TES
included a long chain of sub-inventions— "TranSmart,
Contactless, Cashless, ComMec, Power Chip, VAM, eStore, Interphone, POS, TSCM,
B-B, B-C…" — which, in the pre-Internet era, were gradually
assembled through "Social Responsibility Investment" (SRI) into a new
tech-economic system, much like building an "Ark,"
intended to help humanity weather financial crises and even the COVID shock.
TES
(The eStore System) was invented as a new tech-economic system to solve
structural social problems. When inventor Linda Din presented TES at the 1997
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) meeting in
TES
received international recognition twice at APEC, in 1998 and 2003, and was
regarded as a kind of modern rescue ark. Linda Din’s 1998 proposal contributed
to the drafting of an “E-Commerce Constitution,”
earning her the title “Mother of E-Commerce.”
In 2003, her proposal of "Global Channel–TES"
helped shape best-practice policy. Its "TranSmart
E-pay System" (cashless) was widely emulated worldwide. As an
American recently noted, "Cashless transactions
within TES-related ecosystems reportedly reached US$ 200 trillion in 2025."
It already exceeded global GDP, leading some to call it as the highest-value
invention in human history.
The Origin of TES
In
1985, to address unemployment, Linda Din transformed my "AV Connector" design into something that could
be assembled profitably with just two hands and two square feet of space — earning
more than a monthly MLT salary and selling worldwide — included
Deeply
grounded in "Theology," and combining
practical expertise in accounting, statistics, international trade, and
electronics, Linda Din’s TES confounded experts around the world.
Astonishingly, no one could understand it (not a soul) — not even I, despite
being called a “Gadget Master, Dr. Blacksmith, the Father
of Taiwan Precision Industry.”
She
even organized delegations to
“Extraordinary!” When I interpreted her "Schematic Diagram" as a "Systems Architecture Diagram," I saw two
intersecting channels— "virtual-substantial
integration.” As I studied further, I must write two words on paper:
"Heavenly Mechanism."
At
thirteen, seeking to improve my family’s life, I boldly challenged NASA’s
"PTH" concept and succeeded; Apollo 4
did indeed reach space. In 1974, at age twenty-one, when Chiang Ching-Kuo
inspected my precision industry, he was so impressive that he called me “the Father of Taiwan Precision Industry.” Later, in
1979, after arriving in the
What
I had absorbed from earlier masters — Guan Zhong, Confucius, Guglielmo Marconi,
Max Planck, and Albert Einstein — became, unexpectedly, preparation for
transforming "t-e-s" into practical
reality for future generations.
Guan
Zhong said: “When a state has abundant wealth, people
from afar will come; when land is fully cultivated, the people will stay and
settle."
Confucius
said: “Heaven is high and honourable, earth is low and
mean; and thus heaven and earth (Qian and Kun) are determined. The low and the
high are arranged, and thus the noble and the mean are assigned their places."
Linda
Din, skilled in research, concluded that the world was built on "contact-based systems." She defined TES as
necessarily "contactless," opening
new possibilities without limits. Since meeting an American named Dieska in
1970, I had developed "Antenna Products"
to make big money, and thought in terms of "frequency."
When she spoke of "Radio Frequency"
(RF), I naturally thought first of Marconi, then Planck, and finally Einstein,
whose work I had studied at
Guan
Zhong’s vision of national prosperity aligned naturally with Linda Din’s "t-e-s." And Confucius’s doctrine of "Positioning," I came to believe, was the very
essence of TES — because TES would become a "Future
Positioning System" for human society.
Yet
even the theories of Marconi, Planck, and Einstein were insufficient for what
"t-e-s" required. I had to reach back
to the 18th-century French mathematical genius Pierre-Simon Laplace and his
"Laplace Transform." Through his
"Second Shifting Theorem" (F1) and
"Final Value Theorem" (F2), I derived
a development path for "t-e-s," transforming it from an abstract
concept into an incorruptible technical physical quantity, establishing a
foundation for inclusive economics, survival rights, and what I call the "Global Living Water Initiative."
The Theory and Practice of TES
As
early as 1776 — the year the
Within
such an extremely short interval, the system must exhibit "broadband response capability." Without this
formulation, one cannot calculate how a system responds at the zero moment when
struck by a signal impulse.
In
In
TES’s dynamic system, "reading, erasing, and
writing" do not occur simultaneously but in strict causal sequence,
separated by delay a. To calculate system state at "a = 0.002 seconds," the factor “e−as” converts physical delay in time into
phase displacement in the complex frequency domain. Through this precise
computation, the critical 2-millisecond threshold was identified.
The engineering significance of the Second Shifting Theorem (F1) is
twofold:
1) Enforcement of causality:
Without precise 0.002-second control, "signals overlap." The delay factor ensures
absolute causality on the time axis: erasure must occur exactly after reading.
If this sequence fails, the system can collapse under
2) Phase rotation in the frequency domain:
In microwave communication, “e−as”
represents phase shift. When a is extremely small, the system must sustain
ultra-wide bandwidth response. This explains why Linda Din emphasized "microwave rather than low-frequency induction" —
only high-frequency microwave signals can preserve signal resolution and
analytical accuracy under such tiny delays.
In
short, the core of the "TranSmart
Electronic-payment System" lies in forcing transient effects to
decay rapidly within extremely short time (t) so that earlier signal tails do
not corrupt subsequent actions. σ describes convergence speed; "a = 0.002 seconds" represents time displacement.
Within that boundary, the system completes "read–erase–write,"
stabilizes, transmits through TSCM, reaches the control center, and triggers
enterprise activities across space. That is the operational essence of "t–e–s" in control theory, circuit logic, and
timing analysis.
F2: Final Value Theorem and the “36% of GDP” Estimate
If
F1 made "ultra-fast transaction control"
possible, F2—the Final Value Theorem— made "long-run economic output"
measurable. Its governing relation is:“limt→∞f(t)=lims→0sF(s).”
Using
transaction efficiency of the TranSmart card as an input variable, a transfer
function F(s) can model the global financial network. Letting "s→0" (meaning σ→0 and ω→0, the steady state), one bypasses
short-term fluctuations and directly computes the system’s total output after
dynamic equilibrium. This is where the “36%”
figure emerged.
Because
the virtual channel enabled by TSCM generates "multiplier
effects," the system creates "long-run
static gains" for the broader economy. That percentage represents a
mathematical stability point — not a slogan, but a steady-state output
estimate.
What
makes this theorem produce such extraordinary values is its scale
transformation: from single transaction to national output. Here f(t) represents
“transaction benefits over time.” When t→∞, one examines “the
cumulative stable gain” to a national economy after five years of TES
operation.
Crucially,
the theorem "filters out transient disturbances."
In the early stage of introducing new technology, there will be adaptation
costs, confusion, and inefficiencies. But through the Final Value Theorem,
those short-term oscillations are mathematically stripped away, leaving only
the enduring economic result of the efficiency revolution.
When
transaction time shrinks from 3–5 seconds (or tens of seconds for cash) to
"a = 0.002 seconds," the money multiplier effect undergoes a leap
"from quantitative to qualitative change."
When I substituted this “ultra-short delay”
into the system transfer function and applied the Final Value Theorem, I found
that the efficiency gain could support an industrial value upgrade equivalent
to 36% of global economic output.
That
was not merely a faster payment mechanism. It was the mathematical basis for a
"new economic architecture."
When
Linda Din presented TES at the 1998 AAPEC podium, she sought to redefine "humanity’s value of existence" within space.
Through the social responsibility investment (SRI) logic of “t-e-s,” even delegates who did not grasp the
technical details could sense the system’s vitality and its promise of social
justice.
When
she introduced the "t-e-s pattern" at
APEC, it generated a remarkable “chemical reaction.”
Delegates from economies with divergent political positions — even including
The
reason "t-e-s" had this magnetic
effect was that it struck directly at three pain points in the development of
civilization:
1) The catalytic power of “e”:
transforming resistance into a "superconductor,"
"e" (Electronic / Efficiency / Edge)
is the energy bridge linking time (t) and space (s).
Linda Din early on defined the response speed of the
contactless TranSmart chip card as "0.002 seconds"
— functionally instantaneous in physical
perception. That addressed friction in transaction space. For governments and
enterprises, "s→0" implied that logistics and capital flows would no longer be
constrained by boundaries or time gaps. For ordinary people, it meant
convenience. This vision of "seamlessness,"
in an era when the circulation of goods still faced heavy barriers, sounded almost
like magic — what John Manley called “a door to the
global market” at APEC 1997.
2) From structural unemployment to structural
transformation through a global value chain:
When Mattel shut down MLT and left five thousand
workers unemployed, it was a classic trauma caused by traditional industry’s
spatial displacement. Linda Din’s "t-e-s"
sought to reverse that logic — turning passivity into agency. It proposed:
(1) upgrading conventional
stores into electronic stores,
(2) upgrading contact-based
money into contactless TranSmart chip cards, and
(3) freeing people from
conventional constraints of time and place.
At the same time, it empowered individuals to earn
needed livelihood resources through TES as a new “commercial
mechanism” (ComMec) — even from home — addressing unemployment as a
structural issue, rather than through short-term relief. This was not merely
automation. It was a redesign of participation in economic life.
3) Resonance of psychology and logic:
The almost spell-like power of "t-e-s" arose because it "transformed chaos into order." First, it crossed
ideology. The pursuit of high efficiency, low cost, and seamless collaboration
is "a universal language." TES
presented a blueprint for common prosperity. Second, it captured a sense of the
future. Linda Din did not speak in abstractions; she gave concrete indicators —
"0.002 seconds," and the possibility
of linking "30 million VAMs" into a
global network.
These numbers made the future tangible. They gave
audiences something measurable to imagine. And that is why, as observers noted,
even those who did not fully understand it were captivated by it. In essence,
"t-e-s" was persuasive not only
because it was technically ambitious, but because it aligned "engineering logic, economic restructuring, and moral
imagination" in a single framework. That was the source of its
extraordinary response at APEC.
“t-e-s” and “ABCDE”
The
concept of “TES” (t-e-s) begins when a consumer
uses a contactless "TranSmart Card"
within an "eStore" (electronic
store), triggering a chain of backend operations. It starts with "Algorithms" (A) to process transactions,
followed by transaction-driven "Big Data"
(B) generation. These are coordinated through
The
five elements of "ABCDE" together
forms the structural logic of "t-e-s,"
constituting a new "Commercial Mechanism"
(ComMec) — a techno-economic framework that integrates transaction, control,
energy, and stakeholder coordination into an ordered system capable of
delivering broad social and economic benefits to people worldwide.
The
Stakeholder Interaction and Governance “Domain”
leverages "Social Network Analysis"
(SNA) is used to represent the structured relationships among heterogeneous
participants, including corporations, retailers, government agencies (e.g., tax
authorities, municipal works departments), capital markets (e.g., NASDAQ), and
international economic cooperation forums (e.g., APEC). This area simulates how
these entities conduct transparent economic activities in an orderly,
coordinated, and compliant manner within the TES framework. These "Domains" collectively constitute the conceptual
architecture of TES, encompassing the virtual transaction layer, data analysis
layer, entity supply chain control layer, and social governance layer, thereby
achieving seamless value creation and benefit sharing among all participants in
the economic ecosystem.
This
"ABCDE" architecture, combined with
A Civilizational Covenant
In
sum, when Linda Din won support for what became known as the “E-Commerce Constitution” through "t-e-s," it was because she was not merely
promoting an e-commerce system. She was redefining “humanistic
value of existence” within space.
That
history records a profoundly forward-looking scientific intuition. She sought
to compensate for the “positions” (jobs) lost
by those 5,000 workers, and instead create for the world a greater “time horizon” — a longer-term civilizational
framework. With that “sense of social responsibility," "t-e-s" became more than a technical proposition;
it became "a civilizational covenant."
In
1998, when the Internet was still in its infancy and most people were
connecting by dial-up, her TES proposal was not only a tech-economic solution
but a philosophical revolution about "survival
efficiency." It ignited hope for renewal among economies damaged by
the Asian Financial Crisis — especially
Conclusion
In
2009, when President Barack Obama invited me to contribute the way of "Rebuilding the Global Economy" around the time
of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Leaders’ Meeting, I regarded the logic
of the “Final Value Theorem” — "t→∞" and "s→0"
— combined with the "TranSmart Electronic-payment
System" and the eStore, which links time and space, as a
theoretical foundation for mitigating unprecedented financial crises.
Its
core relation remains: "limt→∞f(t)=lims→0sF(s)."
This
theorem helps the TES system "respond to sudden
shocks" — whether financial volatility or a viral pandemic — by
rapidly estimating the parameters required for the system to return to steady
state. Through such forecasting, governments and enterprises can position
themselves in advance, helping prevent systemic collapse and achieve what might
be called "finding order within disorder."
I
have long believed that time is a matter of "vision"
— one must be able to foresee across a century. Space is "circumstance" — human beings are inevitably
constrained by position. But when one adds fortune in motion — what I associate
here with "The eStore system" (TES) —
social transformation becomes possible.
Thousands
of years of economic activity can enter the realm of "millisecond computation," helping liberate
people from the constraints of time and space. During COVID, for example,
digital systems enabled vast numbers of people to earn livelihoods from home
across borders.
But
such transformation has a price. This "social
responsibility investment" (SRI) required decades of accumulated
resources—including my "Blackstone BSC Angel Fund"
— while also enduring relentless pressures and attacks from cartel-like
corruption.
Although
Linda Din formally proposed “TES” at APEC in
1998 and 2003 — sparking vital 21st-century industries like e-commerce for
daily essentials, the digital economy, and cashless systems — ruthless
multinationals brazenly stole her “intellectual
property rights” (IPRs). They even mobilized cartels to savage the
"Mother of E-Commerce," stripping her
bare. Yet her unyielding faith drives her to open the way for the next
generation.
Like
philosophers who stress this point, we do so as a reminder: "Human beings are not passively trapped by time and space."
By enlarging one’s horizon (time as vision— ‘t→∞’) and positioning oneself well
(space as circumstance— ‘s→
As
the Book of Proverbs says: “The path of the righteous
is like the light of dawn, shining brighter and brighter until full day.”
(Proverbs 4:18) And perhaps especially now, beginning this year, people are
finally starting to recognize the relationship among what is called AI, CPS,
and "t-e-s" (TES). That recognition
may itself mark the beginning of another transformation.
Peter Li-Chang Kuo, the author created
【Copyrights reserved by Li-Chang Kuo & K-Horn Science Inc.】
External Links:
The Inventions of “Linda Din”:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US6304796 (VAM)
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20030197061
(Shopping System)
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20030107468
(Entry Security Device)
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20040054595A1 (ETC)
https://ldinventions.blogspot.com/2022/01/127.html (A Universal Cashless System)
https://khornhb.blogspot.com/2023/10/1011.html
(K-Horn Science Inc.)
https://klcapec.blogspot.com/2024/05/515.html
(The Best Practice)
https://klcapec.blogspot.com/2024/06/609.html
(
https://khornhb.blogspot.com/2024/07/721.html
(Paving the Way for AI)
https://lckstory.blogspot.com/2024/08/818.html
(Disney Intelligent System)
https://ksibusiness.blogspot.com/2024/10/1028.html (SRI & Global
Channel-TES)
https://pklctrips.blogspot.com/2024/12/1231.html
(Kuo’s Journey for 6 Decades)
https://pklctrips.blogspot.com/2025/01/121.html
(Einstein’s Enlightenment)
https://ksibusiness.blogspot.com/2025/04/413.html
(Top Secret)
https://lckstory.blogspot.com/2025/04/428.html
(The Inventions of Linda Din)
https://pklctrips.blogspot.com/2025/07/716.html
(Brain Mine Lasts Forever)
https://pkproclaims.blogspot.com/2025/07/725.html
(Intelligent Industry)
https://plcpolitics.blogspot.com/2025/08/801.html
(Managing A Great Taiwan)
https://ksibusiness.blogspot.com/2025/08/0.html
(Tiny Energy Site)
https://pktesrtn.blogspot.com/2025/08/812.html
(TSCM Information System)
https://pklctrips.blogspot.com/2025/10/1023.html
(A Chronicle of Sixty Years)
https://plcpolitics.blogspot.com/2025/11/1116.html
(60 Years of the KEPZ)
https://plcpolitics.blogspot.com/2025/12/1207.html
(Failures)
https://plcpolitics.blogspot.com/2026/01/107.html
(USD 10 Trillion)
https://pktesrtn.blogspot.com/2026/01/123.html
( TES Invented by Linda Din)
https://tesfund.blogspot.com/2026/02/208.html
(TES Digital Archiving Sponsorship Program)
https://lckstory.blogspot.com/2026/02/210.html
(Barbie’s Legs)
https://lckstory.blogspot.com/2026/02/220.html
(The Great Robbery)
https://plcpolitics.blogspot.com/2026/03/303.html
(Prophetic Report)
https://lckstory.blogspot.com/2026/03/307.html
(The Origins of MJW Association)
https://plcfact.blogspot.com/2026/03/308.html
(“Mother of E-Com” was besieged)
https://plcfact.blogspot.com/2026/03/315.html
(Who Killed the $750 Billion IPO)
https://pklctrips.blogspot.com/2026/03/326.html
(The History of Taiwan’s Industry)
https://plckai.blogspot.com/2026/04/401.html
(When Peter Meets William)
https://ksibusiness.blogspot.com/2026/04/404.html
(Return on Investment)
https://plcori.blogspot.com/2026/04/408.html
(The Origin of E-Commerce)
https://plckai.blogspot.com/2026/04/409.html (AI Barbie)
https://plcori.blogspot.com/2026/04/414.html
(The Origin of 0.002 Seconds)
https://plcori.blogspot.com/2026/04/417.html
(The Origin of “to” Becoming “two”)
https://plcfact.blogspot.com/2026/04/419.html
(The Redemption of Japan)
https://ko-fi.com/ndart2025 (Donate the
NDART)









留言
張貼留言